Letter to the Editor – Harsha Sankar

Dear Editor,                                             

This is in regards to January 12th VR Article regarding to Jared Ryan Jenkins’ suspension from the Virginia State Bar. Its contents are testament of Corpus Juris Secundum, Volume-7, Section-4 which states an Attorney’s first duty is to the courts and the public, not to the client. A lawyer and even counsel is just a participant in the judiciary while an Attorney At-Law is a member of the judiciary. Attorneys are not professionals. They are instead de facto “Officers of the Courts” in the post-Constitutional Administrative Courts with de jure standing and governed by Admiralty/Maritime law. 

Attorney J.R. Jenkins expressed an opinion that the Circuit Court Judge did not like. People need to understand why judges often unlawfully intimidate individuals to obtain attorney representation. The main reason is to implement total censorship. Judges wants the narrative to be totally controlled by the courts they are only supposed to preside. The state statutory law ” Va. Code§ 8.01-271.l” justifies such abject tyranny. Not even Trial By Jury, much less a judge, should sanction anyone for making a claim in the redress of grievances. 

In Jenkins’ matter, this suppression of free speech affected an attorney at-law. All Jenkins did was question the rule of law in a court case in which he was “representing” a client. If a client files a complaint against an attorney at-law, nothing is hardly done. However, if an attorney at-law disputes an action by a judge and/or other “officer of the court”, he/she is highly reprimanded. Jenkins also was tried of allegedly violating Virginia State Bar rules pertaining to honesty despite the fact there was no intent on his part to deceive anyone. Obviously, the BAR Attorney monopolized courts want to eradicate all transparency and not just uniformity.

 

The real problem is not in Washington D.C. It is the “Good Ole Boy And Girl” legal system that is growing more incestuous by the day. There are even family members who serves as de facto Officers in the same court system. The real problem is right in front of people. Yet people cannot see it because of distractions and manipulations. Everything is filtered directly by the BAR hegemonic and neocolonialistic courts or indirectly by its influences.  Yet people cannot see the “forests” because the trees are in the way.   

 

Very Truly Yours, 
Harsha Sankar

Covington, Virginia