COVINGTON, Va. (VR) A two-day civil trial in Alleghany County District Court ended last week with a jury swiftly clearing Tammy Wilson, director of the Alleghany Covington Department of Social Services of wrongdoing in a $5 million lawsuit filed by former employee Deanna Ratliff. After just one hour of deliberation, the seven-person jury rejected Ratliff’s claims of unlawful termination and workplace retaliation, delivering a decisive victory for Wilson and the department of social services.
Ratliff, a former benefit program and self-sufficiency supervisor who worked at DSS from 2018 until her termination on November 1, 2022, alleged she was fired in violation of the Virginia Fraud and Abuse Whistleblower Act. The lawsuit claimed Wilson created a hostile work environment and retaliated against Ratliff for raising concerns about departmental practices, including allegations of improperly trained staff processing sensitive case applications and potential drug test tampering. During testimony, Ratliff portrayed herself as a conscientious employee who repeatedly raised professional concerns about workplace procedures. She emphasized that she was not certified to perform adult or child protective services work and objected to being directed to oversee tasks outside her training and certification.
Wilson’s defense team presented a starkly different narrative, with multiple witnesses describing Ratliff as aggressive, volatile, and prone to disruptive workplace behavior. Witnesses, including former assistant directors, board members, and long-time DSS employees, testified they found Ratliff difficult to work with and had never substantiated her more serious allegations.
Key defense witnesses uniformly denied Ratliff’s most serious claim, that Wilson had conspired with a local drug task force to manipulate client drug test samples. Multiple employees stated such an action would be practically impossible within the department’s operational structure.
The trial’s dramatic conclusion came after a complex series of events surrounding Ratliff’s termination. An internal email separating Ratliff from supervisory duties triggered her heated response, leading to a management decision to terminate her employment. When initially terminated, Ratliff successfully challenged the process through state DSS channels, temporarily securing reinstatement. However, the local office subsequently issued a formal notice of intent to terminate and completed her dismissal with a police escort.
Judge Edward K. Stein had previously removed the Alleghany County Department of Social Services from the lawsuit, leaving Wilson as the sole defendant. Outside the courtroom, Wilson’s supporters celebrated quietly, while Ratliff and her attorney, Thomas Strelka, remained unavailable for immediate comment. The judge has given Ratliff 30 days to file an appeal, though experts present during the proceedings suggested the swift jury verdict significantly undermines her potential case. Ratliff’s original lawsuit sought $5 million in damages, a figure that many in observance felt was somewhat high for such a dispute.
The verdict concludes a contentious legal battle that shed light on internal dynamics within the county’s social services department and raised questions about workplace communication and professional standards.